- Details
-
Written by an Black, Middle East editor an Black, Middle East editor
-
Category: News News
-
Published: 16 November 2009 16 November 2009
-
Last Updated: 16 November 2009 16 November 2009
-
Created: 16 November 2009 16 November 2009
-
Hits: 3593 3593
• Frustration at impasse on 'two-state project'
• Israel warns of retaliation over any unilateral move
Palestinians have formally asked the European Union to urge the UN
security council to recognise a fully independent state in the West
Bank and Gaza Strip in response to the current impasse in peace
negotiations with Israel.
Saeb Erakat, the chief Palestinian negotiator, confirmed that the
request to the EU was made on Monday as Israeli ministers repeated
warnings that any unilateral moves would trigger counter-measures that
could include the annexation of more of the occupied West Bank.
Erakat, speaking in Ramallah, said Israel had for 18 years continued to
"impose facts on the ground by stealing Palestinian lands and building
settlements and barriers aiming to finish off the two-state project".
He added: "We will seek the support of all members of the international
community."
EU foreign ministers are due to discuss the issue in Brussels today but
are unlikely to reach any decision. Diplomats said there was no
question of EU backing for a unilateral declaration of independence by
the Palestinians, which would be likely to be vetoed by Washington. US
senators visiting Jerusalem also warned that such an move would be a
non-starter.
But Erakat made clear that the Palestinians were seeking a security
council resolution spelling out the parameters for resolving the
conflict — crucially without waiting for Israel to negotiate and
without Israeli consent. A key element would be that a Palestinian
state must include the West Bank and Gaza Strip, with East Jerusalem as
its capital, within the 1967 borders in line with existing UN
resolutions.
This move, supported by the Arab League, reflects mounting Palestinian
frustration that negotiations with Israel have reached a dead end due
to the refusal of Binyamin Netanyahu, the Likud prime minister, to
agree to a freeze on settlement activity, as Barack Obama had been
demanding until recently when he appeared to back-pedal.
Analysts say the UN move may also be intended to find a way for Mahmoud
Abbas, the Palestinian president, to remain in office. Abbas, said to
be angry and frustrated, announced last week that he would not stand
for re-election, though the elections originally scheduled for January
have now been postponed.
The Palestinians first declared independence unilaterally in November
1988, seeking to build on the achievements of the first intifada and
Jordan's formal disengagement from the West Bank. That dramatic
declaration was recognised by dozens of countries but never implemented
on the ground. It was superseded by the Israeli-PLO Oslo agreement in
1993, though the negotiations that began then have never been
completed. Israeli settlement activity has also continued unabated
since.
In 2005 Israel disengaged unilaterally from the Gaza Strip without any
agreement with the Palestinians. The area was later taken over by the
Islamist movement Hamas, which is at odds with Abbas's western-backed
Palestinian Authority.
Hamas said on Monday that it opposed diplomatic moves at the UN, with
spokesman Fawzi Barhoum calling Abbas's approach a sign of desperation.
"It's clear that this was a reaction by the Palestinian Authority after
running out of options after two decades of negotiations," he said.
Palestinians, added Hamas official Salah Bardwil, should focus on their
own "ability to liberate the land".
Avigdor Lieberman, Israel's foreign minister, warned: "Any unilateral
movement will be countered by a unilateral move on our part." Another
minister said Israel could respond by annexing some settlements.
Israel annexed East Jerusalem immediately after the 1967 war, while
expanding the city's boundaries, but has always agreed in principle
that it would negotiate over the West Bank. Annexation would close off
that option.
US senator Joseph Lieberman said "an essentially unilateral"
declaration of statehood would not move the peace process forward. "I
hope and presume that the US would veto such a move if it ever came to
the security council," he said.